Comunidades epistémicas en Política Exterior. El caso de Chile en la Alianza del Pacífico

Adler, E. (1992). The emergence of cooperation: national epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control. International Organization, 46(1), 101-145.

Adler, E. (2013). Constructivism in international relations: Sources, contributions, and debates. Handbook of international relations, 2, 112-144.

Adler, E., & Haas, P. (1992). Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the creation of a Reflective research program. International Organization, 46(1), 367-390.

Aranda, G., & Riquelme, J. (2011). La política exterior de Chile desde 1990. Inserción internacional y prioridad regional. Cuadernos sobre Relaciones Internacionales, Regionalismo y Desarrollo, 6(11).

Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2016). Causal case study methods: Foundations and guidelines for comparing, matching, and tracing: University of Michigan Press.

Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2019). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines: University of Michigan Press.

Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool: Cambridge University Press.

Buelvas, E. P., & Alegría, R. C. (2020). Auge y estancamiento de la Alianza del Pacífico. Análisis Carolina(7), 1.

Checkel, J. T. (1998). The constructive turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324-348.

Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(04), 823-830. doi:10.1017/s1049096511001429

Cortez, M., & Maillet, A. (2018). Trayectoria multinivel de una coalición promotora e incidencia en la agenda política nacional. El caso del conflicto de Pascua Lama y la ley de glaciares en Chile. Colombia Internacional(94), 3-25.

Cross, M. a. K. D. (2012). Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later. Review of International Studies, 39(01), 137-160. doi:10.1017/s0260210512000034

Cross, M. a. K. D. (2015). The limits of epistemic communities: EU security agencies. Politics and Governance, 3(1), 90-100.

Davis Cross, M. A. K. (2012). Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 137-160. doi:10.1017/S0260210512000034

Drake, W. J., & Nicolaidis, K. (1992). Ideas, interests, and institutionalization:“trade in services” and the Uruguay Round. International Organization, 46(1), 37-100.

Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289-311.

Durán, R., & Oyarzún, L. (2010). Chile. El escenario regional como complemento a los tratados de libre comercio. Nación y Región en América del Sur, 203-260.

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391-416.

Garcé, A. (2014). Regímenes Políticos de Conocimiento: Construyendo un nuevo concepto a partir de eventos de cambio seleccionados en políticas públicas del gobierno de Tabaré Vázquez (Uruguay, 2005-2009). Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), 34(2), 439-458.

Gardini, G. L. (2018). The Pacific Alliance. In Handbook of International Trade Agreements (pp. 230-240): Routledge.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences: mit Press.

Gough, C., & Shackley, S. (2001). The respectable politics of climate change: the epistemic communities and NGOs. International affairs, 77(2), 329-346.

Haas, P. (1990). Saving the Mediterranean: The politics of international environmental cooperation: Columbia University Press.

Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-35.

Haas, P. (2015). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics: Routledge.

Haas, P. (2021). Epistemic communities. In R. Lavanya & J. Peel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (2nd ed.): Oxford University Press.

Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23(1), 171-200.

Howorth, J. (2004). Discourse, ideas, and epistemic communities in European security and defence policy. West European Politics, 27(2), 211-234.

Hurd, I. (2009). Constructivism. In The Oxford handbook of international relations: Oxford University Press.

Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. Theories of the policy process, 118, 117-166.

Jenne, N., & Briones, S. (2018). Integración regional y la política exterior de Chile ¿Paradoja o acomodo? Estudios Internacionales (Santiago), 50(189), 9-35.

Jordan, A., & Greenaway, J. (1998). Shifting Agendas, Changing Regulatory Structures And The ‘New’ Politics Of Environmental Pollution: British Coastal Water Policy, 1955–1995. Public Administration, 76(4), 669-694. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00131

Katzenstein, P. J. (2005). A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium: Cornell University Press.

Kratochwil, F. (2017). Constructivism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

Kutchesfahani, S. Z. (2010). Politics and the bomb: Exploring the role of epistemic communities in nuclear non-proliferation outcomes. UCL (University College London),

Lee, T. (2021). From nuclear energy developmental state to energy transition in South Korea: The role of the political epistemic community. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(2), 82-93.

Levy, J. S. (2008). Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1-18. doi:10.1080/07388940701860318

Libel, T. (2016). Explaining the security paradigm shift: strategic culture, epistemic communities, and Israel’s changing national security policy. Defence studies, 16(2), 137-156.

Löblová, O. (2018a). Epistemic communities and experts in health policy-making. European journal of public health, 28(3), 7-10.

Löblová, O. (2018b). When epistemic communities fail: exploring the mechanism of policy influence. Policy studies journal, 46(1), 160-189.

Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2004). The possibility principle: Choosing negative cases in comparative research. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 653-669.

Malamud, A. (2005). Presidential diplomacy and the institutional underpinnings of Mercosur: an empirical examination. Latin American Research Review, 138-164.

Morandé, J., & Durán, R. (1993). Percepciones en la política exterior chilena: un estudio sobre líderes de opinión pública. Estudios Internacionales, 26(104).

Onuf, N. (2013). Making sense, making worlds: Constructivism in social theory and international relations: Routledge.

Peterson, J. (1995). Decision‐making in the European Union: Towards a framework for analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(1), 69-93. doi:10.1080/13501769508406975

Peterson, J., & Bomberg, E. (1999). Decision-Making in the European Union: Palgrave.

Radaelli, C. M. (2017). Technocracy in the European Union: Routledge.

Raustiala, K. (1997). Domestic institutions and international regulatory cooperation: Comparative responses to the convention on biological diversity. World Politics, 49(4), 482-509.

Rusu, A., & Löblová, O. (2019). Failure is an option: epistemic communities and the circulation of Health Technology Assessment. In Public Policy Circulation: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Toke, D. (1999). Epistemic communities and environmental groups. Politics, 19(2), 97-102.

Valenzuela, P. (2019). Presidentes frente a cancillerías: la formulación de la política exterior en Brasil y Chile entre 1990 y 2010. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 63-83.

van Klaveren, A. (2011). La política exterior de Chile durante los gobiernos de la Concertación (1990-2010). Estudios Internacionales, 169, 155-172.

Vargas-Alzate, L. F. (2022). Análisis del factor decisional en la política exterior colombiana: el ingreso de Colombia a la Alianza del Pacífico. Desafíos, 34(Especial).

Walker, I. (2006). La política exterior chilena. Estudios Internacionales, 39(155), 9-35.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wilhelmy, M. (1990). Las decisiones de política exterior en Chile. In R. Russell (Ed.), Política exterior y toma de decisiones en América Latina (pp. 135-164). Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.

Wilhelmy, M., & Lazo, R. M. (1997). La política multilateral de Chile en Asia-Pacífico. Estudios Internacionales, 30(117), 3-35.